Legal Opinion

Ft. Payne Co. v. City of Ft. Payne

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1927No. 7 Div. 754PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The purpose of the bill was to enjoin the trespass on tracts of land in a way inconsistent with the use of said property as public parks of the city of Ft. Payne. The decree held that the tracts indicated as Union and Spring Grove Parks had been duly dedicated and accepted by the city as parks and enjoined defendant from trespassing thereon, and denied relief to the city as to Manitou Cave Park. The appeal was by respondents. There was cross-assignment of errors by the city of Ft. Payne as to the denial of relief protecting its right and 'use as a park to the tract called Manitou Cave Park.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Locklin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Douglass v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Heflin v. HeflinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Forney v. Calhoun CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Opinion of The JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Radcliff v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Stringer Realty Co. v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Crosby v. Baldwin CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Vestavia Hills Bd. of Educ. v. UtzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API