Legal Opinion
Bonzo v. Nowlin
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 16, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOREMEN, Judge..
Esther Followay was -the owner -of the minerals in a tract, of land in Pike County. The entire tract was under lease to Walter McGuffin.
On October 7, 1904, Esther Followay and her husband conveyed title to one half of their interest to D. T. Bonzo, together with this power contained in the deed: ■
“The said parties of the first part (Followay) also covenants to and with the said party of the second part (Bon-zo) that in the event that Walter Mc-Guffin and others shall in the future at any time fail in their covenants in the lease hereinbefore mentioned allow the said D. T.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- Odstrcil v. McGlaunCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Jones v. GuyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Moore v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1962