Legal Opinion · Dissent
People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 1911Published
Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, against Egburt E. Woodbury and others.
1Dissent
KELLOGG and SEWELL, JJ.,
dissent in part, being of the opinion -that the relator is not assessable for street occupation, where the street was opened and extended across the right of way, the fee of which had been purchased by and conveyed to the relator before the street was opened. See, also, 140 App. Div. 848, 125 N. Y. Supp. 728; 125 N. Y. Supp. 730, 140 App. Div. 945.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910