Legal Opinion

Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1984No. C1-84-484PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

William Swanstrom appeals from a judgment and decree that declares part interest in his company, a promissory note, and an investment fund to be marital property. He also disputes the award of permanent maintenance and attorney’s fees to Diane Swanstrom. Diane Swanstrom cross-appeals, contending the trial court erred in determining her interest in the company and ordering distribution of that interest in delayed monthly payments rather than a lump sum and in failing to require William Swanstrom to maintain a medical insurance policy and a life insurance policy to secure…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Kirby v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Servin v. ServinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Marriage of McClelland v. McClellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marriage of Frederiksen v. FrederiksenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Justis v. JustisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Bateman v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Erdahl v. ErdahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Griepp v. GrieppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API