Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Austin v. Austin

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1986No. 85-576PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Petitioner, State of Montana, brought this Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) action to enforce a child support obligation and obtain reimbursement for the State of Oklahoma. The Lake County District Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. From this order the State appeals.

We reverse the District Court’s order dismissing the case. We hold that the child support obligation was not dischargeable in bankruptcy and remand for a determination of the amount of arrearages which respondent is obligated to pay the State of Oklahoma.

The following issues…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Rough v. District Court of Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. McGaheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API