Legal Opinion

San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. Adams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1894No. 153PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Chief Justice James, being disqualified, did not sit in the case in Court of Civil Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

The defendants in error, H. B. Adams, E. D. L. Wickes, and Caroline Kampmann, each brought a separate suit in the District Court of Bexar County against the plaintiff in error, the San Antonio Street Railway Company, to enjoin it from proceeding to forfeit certain shares in the company respectively owned by them, for nonpayment of assessments. By agreement the three suits were consolidated and were proceeded with as one, The following are the facts of the case as shown by the statement of facts:

The company was incorporated by virtue of a special act of the…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. X-Ray Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Henshaw v. Texas Natural Resources FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Dunagan v. BusheyTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API