Legal Opinion
Cislo v. City of Shelton
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 26, 1996No. 13249PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered in favor of the defendant, after the granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. On his appeal as amended, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and (2) denied the plaintiffs motion to open the judgment and to set aside the summary judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On October 12, 1989, the plaintiff, a Shelton police officer, was arrested and charged with the sexual assault of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cislo v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Fillion v. HannonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Fleet Credit Corp. v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Cislo v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Kahn v. Watford, No. Cvbr-9601-02973 (Apr. 12, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.