Holland v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
The facts of this case reveal that a co-defendant, (Brownlee), entered a negotiated plea relevant to a robbery, just prior to going to trial, but adjudication and sentencing were withheld. Later that same afternoon, he (Brownlee) was subpoenaed by the State to testify at a deposition pursuant to the Florida Immunity Statute which provides:
914.04 Witnesses; person not excused from testifying in certain prosecutions on ground testimony might incriminate him; immunity from prosecution. — No person, having been duly served with a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, shall be excused…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Hough v. PopperSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- State v. SchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Hollywood v. WashingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- State v. JennyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996