Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 15, 1977No. 75-2285PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

The facts of this case reveal that a co-defendant, (Brownlee), entered a negotiated plea relevant to a robbery, just prior to going to trial, but adjudication and sentencing were withheld. Later that same afternoon, he (Brownlee) was subpoenaed by the State to testify at a deposition pursuant to the Florida Immunity Statute which provides:

914.04 Witnesses; person not excused from testifying in certain prosecutions on ground testimony might incriminate him; immunity from prosecution. — No person, having been duly served with a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, shall be excused…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Hough v. PopperSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. State v. SchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Hollywood v. WashingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. JennyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API