Legal Opinion
People v. Barr
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 9, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We reject the contention of defendant that the testimony of the confidential informant and the New York State police investigator is incredible as a matter of law (see, People v Briggs, 190 AD2d 995, 996, lv denied 81 NY2d 1011; People v Stroman, 83 AD2d 370, 373). "Minor inconsistencies in the testimony of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. StromanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. EiffelNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. SantangeloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. TuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. StephanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020