Legal Opinion

Wrzesinski v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 18, 1999No. S99A1159Published

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

Jimmy Wrzesinski operated a dental lab, but was not licensed to practice dentistry. At Wrzesinski’s place of business, he took impressions of teeth for the purpose of making appliances usable as teeth, which appliances were not ordered by and returned to a licensed den*660tist. Under OCGA § 43-11-50, it is unlawful to practice dentistry without a license and, pursuant to OCGA § 43-11-17 (a) (6), a person “shall be regarded as practicing dentistry’ if he or she “[m]akes, repairs, adjusts, or relines appliances usable on teeth or as teeth unless such appliances, repairs, adjustment,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Crews v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Holcomb v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  5. Lord v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API