Legal Opinion

Moore v. Saxton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order and decree of the Court of Probate for the district of Winchester ascertaining the heirs at law and distributees of an intestate estate and ordering distribution accordingly, taken by the plaintiffs to and tried by the Superior Court in Litchfield County, Reed, J.; facts found and judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, confirming the action of the Court of Probate, and appeal by the plaintiffs.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order and decree of the Court of Probate for the district of Winchester ascertaining the heirs at law and distributees of an intestate estate and ordering distribution accordingly, taken by the plaintiffs to and tried by the Superior Court in Litchfield County, Reed, J.; facts found and judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, confirming the action of the Court of Probate, and appeal by the plaintiffs. Ruth Deborah Richards, a resident of the town of Winchester in this State, died intestate on January 12th, 1914, leaving personal estate and no husband, descendants,…

1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, C. J.

By the law of California, in which State their parents were domiciled at the time of their birth, the children of Charles Platt Saxton and Emma Byrne were, at birth, legitimate. By a statute of that State enacted. in 1850 and still in force, the issue of marriages null in the law are declared legitimate, and the courts of that State have determined that this provision is applicable to the issue of marriages null because bigamous. Laws of California, 1850, p. 188, § 2; Civil Code of California, 1872, § 1387; Graham v. Bennet, 2 Cal. 503. Their personal status as legitimates thus established is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Gildersleeve v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  3. Cristilly v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Graham v. BennetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Philadelphia, Reading & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nagle v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. State v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Kowalski v. WojtkowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Green v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Holloway v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API