AstraZeneca UK Ltd. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentMayer, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. There can be no infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent No. 37,314 (the “'314 patent”) because that patent is invalid for improper reissue. Reissue is available under 35 U.S.C. § 251 to rectify an “error” resulting from inadvertence, accident, or mistake. No such error was present in U.S. Patent No. 5,260,440 (the “ '440 patent”), so there is no basis upon which it could properly be reissued. Furthermore,'Shionogi Seiyaku Kabushiki Kaisha (“Shionogi”) has forfeited the right to obtain reissue by its failure to exercise due diligence in seeking to rectify the alleged defect…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Superior Fireplace Company v. The Majestic Products Company and Vermont Castings, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- In Re Elmar W. Weiler and Richard L. MansellCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.