Legal Opinion

Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Dallas Central Appraisal District

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 9, 2000No. 05-99-00480-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MOSELEY.

Appellant, Sears Roebuck and Company (“Sears”), sued appellee, the Dallas Central Appraisal District (“DCAD”), contesting DCAD’s ad valorem tax appraisal of Sears’s inventory. After a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of DCAD and upheld the inventory values as appraised by DCAD. In thirteen points of error, Sears challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s judgment. Sears also challenges, as a matter of law, the trial court’s conclusion that the market value of Sears’s inventory was equal to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. City of Clute v. City of Lake JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. SAVA Gumarska in Kemijska Industria D.D. v. Advanced Polymer Sciences, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  2. Compass Bank v. MFP Financial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  3. Landerman v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  4. Stuckey Diamonds, Inc. v. Harris County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. Lewis v. Dallas Soundstage, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API