Legal Opinion
State v. Arnsberg
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 29, 1976No. 1 CA-CR 1255PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The basic issue raised by this appeal is whether a defendant may raise issues concerning a denial of his motion to suppress evidence following a plea of no contest.
„ The appellant was originally charged in a two-count information with possession of marijuana for sale and possession of a dangerous drug. Subsequent to the denial of his motion to suppress, the appellant entered into a plea agreement with the County Attorney whereby count two, possession of dangerous drugs and a charge in CR-84440, possession of narcotics, were dropped in return for his plea of no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jaben v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Fierro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- United States v. Florencio SepeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Clauson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- State v. CowleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SnodgrassCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.