Wheeler v. Lynch
Mississippi Supreme Court
From the chancery court of DeSoto county. Hon. Julian C. Wilson, Chancellor. Wheeler, the appellant, was complainant in the court below; Tjyncli and another, appellees, were defendants there. From a decree dismissing the bill complainant appealed to the supreme court.
Read the full summary
From the chancery court of DeSoto county. Hon. Julian C. Wilson, Chancellor. Wheeler, the appellant, was complainant in the court below; Tjyncli and another, appellees, were defendants there. From a decree dismissing the bill complainant appealed to the supreme court. Appellant filed his bill in chancery in July, 1906, claiming title to lands sold to him March 7, 1904, for the taxes of 1903. His tax deed, an exhibit to the bill, described the land .as “situated in the county and assessed to Betty Lynch, to-wit: West part, northwest section 29, township I, range 8, one hundred and ten (110.)…
1Opinion of the CourtCalhoon, J.
We think the demurrer to the original bill should have been overruled. See the cases cited ,in the brief of counsel. If this were not true, it is still true that the demurrer to the amended declaration should have been overruled. Ann. Code 1892, § 3776; Dodds v. Marx, 63 Miss., 445.
Reversed and remanded, with thirty days to appellee to ansiuer the bill after mandate filed below.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Carr v. BartonMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
- Albritton v. FairleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Brown v. WomackMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Woods v. LinderMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- Jefferson v. WalkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1946