Edwards v. Trustees of the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN, Judge.
In this declaratory action we affirm a judgment declaring that retirement under the judges’ contributory retirement plan (LRS 11:558, as amended by Act 1063 of 1991) is “regular retirement” within the meaning of DROP (the deferred retirement option plan in LRS 11:447, as amended by Act 14 of 1990), and that the DROP option shall be made available to the plaintiff judge, who is a member of LASERS (Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System).1
Plaintiff’s answer to the appeal seeks to amend the judgment by further declaring that plaintiff’s written notification of November…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swift v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Groves v. Board of Trustees of Teach. Retire. Sys.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Maillet v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS'RETIRE. SYS.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
- Hay v. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Moise v. Louisiana State Employees' Retirement SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrison v. TRAUSTEES OF LA. STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Karno v. Trustees of the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports1993