Legal Opinion

Cottman v. Villas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 7, 1995No. 32PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this case we reaffirm that, on an appeal from the District Court of Maryland, the amount in controversy in an action for possession of leased premises is determined by the fair market rent for the period of possession involved in the controversy.

Respondent, Princess Anne Villas (Princess Anne), is a federally subsidized housing project financed by the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). Beginning October 1, 1987 Petitioner, Tyzanna Cottman (Cottman), entered into a series of yearly leases with Princess Anne. During the October 1, 1992 to September 30, 1993 renewal Cottman…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thelma Joy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Holland Daniels, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  2. Carroll v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Anderson v. DennyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1973
  4. Purvis v. Forrest Street ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chateau Foghorn LP v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Williams v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Grady Management, Inc. v. EppsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Kirk v. Hilltop Apartments, LPCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Solberg v. Majerle ManagementCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API