Legal Opinion

Corthell v. Board of the County Commissioners

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1932No. 1726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The record in this case is here upon proceedings in error. It was at first thought that it was obligatory upon the court to dispose of the case in connection with a question of procedure. This arose through a misapprehension due to an incorrect statement in the record of a controlling fact ap pearing in it. As that matter has been cleared np by counsel, the cause will now be considered on its merits.,

The pleadings of the parties and an agreed statement of facts upon which the ease was tried disclose substantially the following situation material to be considered: Sand-gren and Smart, dealers…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Turpin v. LemonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bailey v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Commonwealth v. Harrisburg Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Blewett v. Richardson Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. People ex rel. Murray v. City of St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paradise Valley Country Club v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Orcutt v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Tibbals v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API