Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Leesburg v. Hector Supply Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1970No. 69-627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

The appellee was the plaintiff in the original action, and prevailed in its law suit against the partnership of Roher and Peterson. Thus, the appellee became a judgment creditor and found it necessary to bring a garnishment action against the First National Bank of Leesburg, garnishee, to collect the judgment from the judgment debtor, appellee. The subject matter against which the garnishor proceeded was a bank account maintained by defendant Noah Peterson and Mayre Lou Peterson, his wife. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the appellee, holding that Peterson…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hagerty v. HagertySupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Winters v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Rader v. First Nat. Bank in Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  4. Glasser v. Columbia Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  5. Holman v. MaysOregon Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheeler v. US Bank of SeminoleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Snyder v. DinardoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. First National Bank of Leesburg v. Hector Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. O'Rourke v. Associates Discount Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API