Legal Opinion

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The questions submitted to the court in this case arise upon a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari shall not be granted to remove into this court the proceedings taken by the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Bergen, under the provisions of an act entitled “An act to enable boards of chosen freeholders to acquire, improve and maintain public roads,” approved March 9th, 1889. Pamph. L., p. 58.

The principal reason relied upon to vacate the proceedings below is the radical one, that the act is unconstitutional.

The first…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert J. Boyd Paving & Contracting Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. Harrington Township Road Commission v. Collector of Harrington TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API