Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Bowell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1817Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Legislature have thought proper to attempt the suppression of the practice of issuing due-bills, as one extremely mischievous to the community; and one method they have adopted is to make the person liable to an action who issues a due-bill for a less sum than ten shillings. It would materially weaken the effect of this law, and disarm it of its sting, if, when such separate actions are brought, the court should interpose a consolidation rule. Such interference would be peculiarly improper in the present case, in which the (635) plaintiff, by warranting and blending $4 in each warrant,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caldwell, Ex'r v. . BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Person v. President of the State Bank of N. C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1826

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API