Legal Opinion

Mitton v. Verizon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 22, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] John Mitton appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Collier; HO) determining that because Mitton had received 800 weeks of permanent total incapacity benefits pursuant to the conclusively presumptive time period established in 39-A M.R.S. § 212(2)(G) (2011), the employer could prospectively take statutory offsets against Mitton’s benefits pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 221 (2011). We affirm the hearing officer’s decision.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] Seventeen years ago, John Mitton suffered a work-related stroke on February 15, 1995, while employed by NYNEX, Verizon’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Grubb v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. Ferns v. Russ Graham Shell ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Boehm v. American Falcon Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael Fortin v. Jacob TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. David L. Scott Jr. v. Fraser Papers, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  3. Michael Fortin v. Jacob TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API