Mitton v. Verizon
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] John Mitton appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Collier; HO) determining that because Mitton had received 800 weeks of permanent total incapacity benefits pursuant to the conclusively presumptive time period established in 39-A M.R.S. § 212(2)(G) (2011), the employer could prospectively take statutory offsets against Mitton’s benefits pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 221 (2011). We affirm the hearing officer’s decision.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] Seventeen years ago, John Mitton suffered a work-related stroke on February 15, 1995, while employed by NYNEX, Verizon’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Grubb v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Ferns v. Russ Graham Shell ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Boehm v. American Falcon Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michael Fortin v. Jacob TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- David L. Scott Jr. v. Fraser Papers, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Michael Fortin v. Jacob TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013