Legal Opinion

Faviola, LLC v. Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 19, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

*824In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an easement by necessity for ingress and egress over a portion of certain real property, and for injunctive relief, the defendants Pravinkumar Patel and Anita Patel appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered May 3, 2012, which, in effect, granted the plaintiffs motion to confirm a referee’s report dated September 14, 2011, and denied their cross motion to reject the referee’s report, and declared that the plaintiff has a right-of-way access…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heyman v. . BiggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Simone v. HeidelbergNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. U.S. Cablevision Corp. v. TheodoreuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Stock v. OstranderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Pickett v. WhippleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API