Legal Opinion

Steinfeld v. Bolen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1915No. Civil No. 1396Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of' Pima. W. F. Cooper, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The plaintiff appellee, as the assignee and legal owner and holder of a real estate mortgage, brought this action to foreclose on the mortgaged property which had, by mesne conveyance from the mortgagor, come into the ownership and possession of defendant appellant. The mortgage was given on January 31, 1907, to secure a note of same date for $1,500, payable on or before five years after date, bearing 9 per cent interest, but the note provided it should be payable in monthly installments of $25 per month, plus interest for such month on the entire debt. The payee of the note and mortgage died…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bergen v. . Urbahn, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Buckmaster v. KelleySupreme Court of Florida · 1875
  3. Bassett v. HathawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. George v. LudlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ward v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API