Cervino v. Konsker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The question in this case is whether a default judgment for $29,423.17 rendered in favor of the plaintiffs against defendant Shirley A. Konsker should stand. For the reasons set forth below our answer is “No”.
The action arises out of a contract for the sale of a house. On September 21, 1978 defendant Shirley Konsker signed a real estate contract to sell her house to the plaintiffs, Anthony R. Cervino and Phyllis E. Cervino. The Cervinos *250were represented by Richard T. Lombard, Esq., and Mrs. Konsker was represented by Martin Odorisio, Esq. The purchase price was $64,000.…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Pumpelly v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Mokar Properties Corp. v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- S.E.S. Importers, Inc. v. PappalardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Neuman v. GreenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Brosnan v. BehetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dupkanicova v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Quigley v. Coco's Water Café, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Interboro Management Co. v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.