Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1930No. 13382Published

1Opinion

on appellant’s motion for rehearing.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant’s motion is predicated on bills of exception Nos. 1, 11, 3, 7, 7a, 5, 6, 19, 20, 30 and 21. We state them in the above order because they so appear in the motion. In support of the motion a strong written argument has been filed urging that we were in error as shown in some of the bills mentioned, which written argument was supplemented by a forceful oral presentation of appelant’s contentions.

Bill No. 3 complains of the court’s refusal to compel the state to elect between acts of intercourse. Bills 5 and 6 complain of the admission…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leahy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Funk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Askew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API