Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ross v. Egan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The defendant, named as John Doe, with several aliases, was found guilty generally on nine counts of an indictment charging various offenses connected with a bank robbery. Sentence was imposed on only the first, second and eighth charges, as to which no technical legal objection had been entered. As pointed out by the Superior Court in disposing of the appeal which followed the above judgment (Com. v. Doe, 79 Pa. Superior Ct. 162), no sentence was directed except on the counts which admittedly averred violations of law in a proper manner.
The review of the conviction, following…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Halderman's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Mullan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Commonwealth ex rel. Greevy v. ReifsteckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McGlinn v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marelia v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.