Legal Opinion

Maccar Trucks, Inc. v. Gorenstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 31, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed, upon the law, and new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to defendant, appellant, to abide the event. The new trial is limited to the determination of the amount of defendant’s lien. The court below apparently believed the defendant’s claim that he had no knowledge of the sale of the truck by the plaintiff under its chattel mortgage, or of the seizure thereunder, and did not convert any of the personal property; and found that the plaintiff permitted the truck to be operated under the license and with the license plates and business name of the mortgagors,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johanns v. . FickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. PeckettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associates Commercial Corp. v. FranciscoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  2. Commercial Acceptance Corp. v. Hislop Garage Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Rochester Production Credit Ass'n v. Dickens Bros., New York County Courts1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API