Legal Opinion
Raper v. Hazelett & Erdal
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 13, 1983No. 81-2716PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Plaintiff, James Raper, administrator of the estate of Beth Raper, brought suit to recover damages against defendant Hazelett & Erdal, an Illinois partnership, for damages sustained by the alleged negligence of defendant in the construction and design of a highway median in Kentucky over which an errant vehicle crossed, striking the car of plaintiff’s decedent and resulting in her death.
The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that a prior suit, brought by plaintiff in the Kentucky Board of Claims, found that the median was constructed in accordance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Thomas E. Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Pearson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Riley v. Unknown OwnersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- County of Cook v. Midcon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Ruben Sanchez v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Rose Torres, D.B.A. Legal Secretarial Services v. Steve RebarchakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Taylor v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Nikitas (In Re Nikitas)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.