Denson v. Battle Bros.

1. The trial judge did not err in refusing to allow the proposed amendment to the defendant’s answer, setting up alleged false and fraudulent representations of the plaintiff in regard to the qualities of the horse in question, since the execution of the note which was the basis of the suit was'admitted, and in the note it was declared that the horse was sold without any warranty, either express or implied.

2. One of the defenses originally set up in the defendant’s answer contradicted and sought to supplant the writing signed by him, and the defense of rescission presented in the plea was…