Legal Opinion

Bevis v. Roden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1962No. 8 Div. 53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

Rule 9 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Alabama, effective June 1, 1955, pro-' vides:

“Appellant’s brief under separate headings shall contain: (a) under the heading ‘Statement of the Case,’ a concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and exception relied upon referring to the pages of the transcript; (b) under the heading ‘Statement of the Facts,’ a condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form so as to present the substance clearly and concisely, referring to the pages of the transcript, and if the insufficiency of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. City of Montgomery v. MottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Kendall Alabama Company v. City of Fort PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Finklea v. BrunsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. State v. Argo-Collier Truck Lines CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API