Legal Opinion

Riordan v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903Published

Motion to set aside a verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

The verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff cannot stand, unless the proofs submitted in plaintiff’s behalf would warrant the jury in finding as matters of fact, first, the notorious existence at the time of the accident of a public road or pathway leading from the ferry across defendant’s tracks, running diagonally in a southwesterly direction to the foot of a public staircase built along the side of a hill, and secondly, that plaintiff, while crossing this pathway, was struck by defendant’s train. The testimony shows beyond dispute that near the place where the accident occurred a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyle v. . New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Lagerman v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API