Legal Opinion
Cornish v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 09-797 (RWR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish moves for reconsideration of the August 15, 2012 memorandum opinion and order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Cornish reargues legal arguments raised and rejected in the memorandum opinion and order, argues that he has new claims and evidence, and asserts that the court clearly erred on the facts and the law. Because Cornish has not established that there are extraordinary circumstances warranting relief from final judgment, his motion will be denied.1
BACKGROUND
The relevant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. Ii)- Mdl No. 2925District Court, District of Columbia · 2021