Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Security Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 16, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The only controversy in this case is over failure to give proofs of loss. It is apparently assumed by both parties that the policy is a Nebraska contract, and it purports to be a uniform standard Nebraska farm policy, approved by the Nebraska state insurance board. The insured property consisted of a barn and other buildings in Nebraska. The policy was issued in 1916 to McDonnell. ' Approvals dated' May 15, 1918, of assignment by McDonnell to Zahner, and December 19, 1918, of assignment by Zahner to plaintiff, were secured through the local agent, Kiley, at Fairbury, Nebraska. It does not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Woodmen Accident Ass'n v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chapin v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Solomon v. . Continental Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Ætna Insurance v. SimmonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hessen v. Iowa Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. American Liberty Insurance Company v. SoulesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Gifford v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Wilson v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Miller v. Mutual Fire & Tornado Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API