Legal Opinion

Brown Durrell Co. v. Belisle

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This is a case in which the meaning of doubtful language is to be determined. The doubt is not in the law but in its application. The proposition that “the obligation of a guarantor is that which the fair import of the language used imposes upon him” (Simons v. Steele, 36 N. H. 73, 80), expresses the general rule of construction in reference to a particular class of contracts, and states about the only substantive rule of law to be invoked. Nor is there here any question of the rule which within certain defined limits admits extrinsic evidence as of aid in deciding the issue. The character of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kendall v. GreenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893
  2. Galloway v. BabbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Rueter v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lavigne v. LavigneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  2. Manchester Bank v. Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. FDIC v. R & A Nenni BuildersDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API