Legal Opinion
Mueller v. Allen
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 13, 1981No. Civ. 3-80-395PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RENNER, District Judge.
This action challenges the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 290.09(22) (1978), as violative of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Plaintiffs assert that the challenged statute is a law advancing an establishment of religion and is in restraint of the free exercise of religion. Accordingly, plaintiffs seek a judgment by this Court invalidating the statute and an injunction against its enforcement by the State of Minnesota.
Initially, suit was brought by five individual plaintiffs on behalf of the taxpayers of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mueller v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First of America Bank v. Gaylor (In Re Gaylor)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- In Re Shattuc Cable Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
- Coyne v. Westinghouse Credit Corp. (In Re Globe Illumination Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.