Legal Opinion
Frey v. Allstate Law Firm PC
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 29, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01053Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jeremy Frey, No. CV-22-01053-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Allstate Law Firm PC et al, 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Jeremy Frey (“Plaintiff”) has filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment 16 against Defendants Allstate Law Firm P.C., Rick Daniel Adams, and Jane Doe Adams 17 (collectively “Defendants”) (Doc. 14). The Motion is unopposed, and the time to file a 18 response has passed. See LRCiv 7.2(c). The Court will grant Plaintiff’s Motion for the 19 reasons below. 20 I. Background 21 Plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.