Legal Opinion

Elliot v. Maverick Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 2004No. CA 03-1348PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Appellant Jay Elliot appeals from the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision barring his claim under the election of remedies doctrine, and alternatively holding that Elliot failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to additional medical treatment and temporary total disability benefits. We agree that Elliot’s claim is barred by the election of remedies, and affirm.

Elliot, an Oklahoma resident, injured his back while employed as a truck driver for Maverick Transportation (Maverick), an Arkansas corporation, on January 18, 2001.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston Contracting Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Auslander v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Williams v. Brown's Sheet Metal/CNA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Biddle v. Smith & Campbell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Houston Contracting Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Johnson Custom HomesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Williams v. Johnson Custom HomesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Williams v. Johnson Custom HomesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Williams v. Johnson Custom HomesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API