Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1977No. 16895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Justice.

This action by appellants, former employees of the City of Houston, questions the authority of the City to terminate their employment without holding a hearing before the civil service commission. The trial court dismissed the appellants’ suit for want of jurisdiction.

Under the Civil Service Code of the City of Houston each employee appointed to a position in the classified service is required to complete a twelve month probationary period termed a “working test period”, before being considered a classified employee. (Sec. 12-122, Division 9, Rule 9.)

Another section of Rule 9,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pruitt v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. City of Tacoma v. Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Sanchez v. El Paso Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Louisville Professional Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montemayor v. City of San Antonio Fire Department, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Stephens v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  3. Bartek v. Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission of TempleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Bartholomew U. Stephens v. City of Houstons, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. Montemayor v. City of San Antonio Fire Department, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API