Legal Opinion
State v. Strickling
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 3, 1992No. 910621-CAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
844 P.2d 979 (1992)
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Phillip D. STRICKLING, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 910621-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
December 3, 1992.
Rehearing Denied January 15, 1993.
Robert L. Steele, Joan C. Watt, Paul M. Grant, and Ronald S. Fujino (argued), Salt Lake Legal Defender Ass'n, Salt Lake City, for appellant.
R. Paul Van Dam, State Atty. Gen. and J. Kevin Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Salt Lake City, for appellee.
Before GARFF, JACKSON and ORME, JJ.
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
Defendant appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence based on the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.