Legal Opinion

Peekskill Suburbs, Inc. v. Morabito

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

On this record, it cannot be said that petitioner has established a legal infirmity in the denial of the change of zoning. Nor can we conclude that the refusal to grant the change is confiscatory, especially since the property is the subject of nonconforming uses which were not alleged or shown to be without economic value.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. F.M.V. Realty Co. v. VecchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. James H. Maloy, Inc. v. Town Board of the Town of GuilderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Nogas v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API