Legal Opinion

Coakley v. Weil

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. On March 14th, 1876, Charles Wirschnitzer and John Rapp, co-partners, trading as Wirschnitzer and Rapp, executed a deed of trust of all their property, real, personal and mixed, to M. Star Weil, in trust for the benefit of their creditors, which as is admitted, was duly executed, acknowledged and recorded.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. On March 14th, 1876, Charles Wirschnitzer and John Rapp, co-partners, trading as Wirschnitzer and Rapp, executed a deed of trust of all their property, real, personal and mixed, to M. Star Weil, in trust for the benefit of their creditors, which as is admitted, was duly executed, acknowledged and recorded. The trustee, on the same day, filed his bond as trustee, with the clerk of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, which was duly approved. On the fourth day of May, 1876, the trustee filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

by the Court.

The judgment in this case will be affirmed for the reasons assigned by the Judge of the Superior Court in his opinion sent up with the record.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reyburn v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Hanford v. ProutyIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API