Legal Opinion
Peagler and Manley Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Studebaker
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 26, 1980No. 59892PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
Appellees Charles and Kathy Studebaker brought an action against appellant insurance agency, alleging negligent failure to procure uninsured motorist coverage. The case proceeded to trial, and appellees obtained a jury verdict in the amount of $1,500. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict. We reverse with direction.
“It is a condition precedent to an action against an automobile liability insurance carrier to recover under the provisions of [Code § 56-407.1] on account of injuries and damages to the plaintiff resulting from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Church's Fried Chicken, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. GirtmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. StudebakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Doyal & Associates, Inc. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stephens v. Worden Insurance Agency, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Williams v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Robinson v. J. Smith Lanier & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Four Seasons Healthcare, Inc. v. Willis Insurance Services of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.