Legal Opinion

B. F. Edington Drilling Co. v. Yearwood

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1960No. 43980PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks recovery of $3,569.60, allegedy due for services rendered and materials furnished to defendant on two contracts. In May, 1955 defendant engaged plaintiff company to clear out and test an old water well located on his farm in Red River Parish. Plaintiff cleaned out, acidized and swabbed the abandoned well but was unable to cause it to produce water in satisfactory amounts. As a consequence, defendant thereafter made a verbal agreement with Mr. I. A. Mayeaux, Manager of plaintiff company, to drill a *307new water well on his land. To confirm their understanding,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Di Cristina v. WeiserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Pratt v. McCoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Bouterie v. CarreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Dalgarn v. New Orleans Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Mazureau v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ouachita Nat. v. Gulf States Land & Dev.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Louisiana State Mineral Board v. AlbaradoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  4. BF Edington Drilling Company v. YearwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  5. Terral v. BeardenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API