Legal Opinion
At & T v. Herrig (In Re Herrig)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 3, 1998No. 19-10219PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, Bankruptcy Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the Court for trial on January 15, 1998. Plaintiff AT & T appeared by and through its attorney, Michael Morgan. Defendant Dennis Florian Herrig (“Debtor” or “Herrig”) appeared by and through his attorney, Gary G. Grisso. The Court received evidence and heard argument from the parties. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law are made pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52.
Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this contested matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b).…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors. Fowler Brothers v. Robert J. Young and Donna M. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman, Bankrupts. John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman v. Edgar F. Mann and Edna M. Mann, Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- At&T Universal Card Services v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Chevy Chase Bank FSB v. Kukuk (In Re Kukuk)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Ritter (In Re Ritter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Boyd Gaming Corp v. Hall (In Re Hall)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1998
- Bank of Commerce v. Smith (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.