Legal Opinion

In re Strickland

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided February 26, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On petition of bankrupt to review order of referee allowing J. G. Curry, a creditor, to withdraw proof of debt and intervention.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, District Judge.

The bankrupt has filed a petition for the review of an order by the referee, permitting one J. G. Curry, an alleged lien creditor of the bankrupt, to withdraw from the records' of the court his proof of debt and intervention. These are based upon two purchase-money notes, containing- waivers of homestead and exemption, aggregating the sum of $879.49. The ground of the motion for the withdrawal of the claim was “inadvertence upon the part of counsel, being mistaken as to the proper forum in which he should endeavor to set up said claim.” On January 13, 1908, Strickland…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. IdemSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Dykes v. McVaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scholl Mfg. Co. v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Lee Lun v. HenryHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In re Natow Bros.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  4. Farr v. DatoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API