Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1793PublishedCited by 10 opinions

THIS suit was instituted by the plaintiff, for the use of Moore & Johnson against Andrew Caldwell, the surviving partner of Andrew and James Caldwell. Vance, Caldwell, and Vance, had assigned to Moore & Johnson, a debt due to them from Andrew, and James Caldwell, and those assignees employed the plaintiff as their agent to recover the amount.

Read the full summary

THIS suit was instituted by the plaintiff, for the use of Moore & Johnson against Andrew Caldwell, the surviving partner of Andrew and James Caldwell. Vance, Caldwell, and Vance, had assigned to Moore & Johnson, a debt due to them from Andrew, and James Caldwell, and those assignees employed the plaintiff as their agent to recover the amount. The defendant, accordingly, gave Fitzgerald a note dated the 8th of April, 1782, for £5009 5 1, "provided so much appeared due to Vance & Co. on a settlement of accounts.” The matter in dispute was agreed to be referred; and the referees reported that…

1Opinion of the Court

M'Kean, Chief Justice.

It is clearly the general rule that a garnishee is not liable for interest, while he is restrained from the payment of his debt, by the legal operation of a foreign attachment. But it is said by the plaintiff’s Counsel, and I assent to the proposition, that if there is any fraud, or collusion; nay, if there is any unreasonable delay occasioned by the con*216duct of the garnishee himself, such cases will form exceptions to the general rule. In the present instance, however, there is no proof of fraud, or collusion; nor of any wilful procrastination on the part of the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mackey v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  2. Jackson's Executors v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. President, Directors of Oriental Bank v. Tremont InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1842
  4. Blair & Hunt v. PorterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1861
  5. Chase v. ManhardtHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1821

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API