United States v. Laphonse Young
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
In this case, we consider an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether a defendant’s right to proceed pro se is unqualified if the defendant asserts his request after the jury is empaneled but before the jury is sworn. Following the dictate of Chapman v. United States, 553 F.2d 886 (5th Cir.1977), 1 and several other circuits’ interpretive holdings, we hold that a defendant’s right of self-representation is unqualified if the defendant asserts that right before the jury is empaneled, absent any indication that the defendant is attempting to delay the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Tyrone Walker, Walter Diaz, A/K/A Eric Rogers, and Anthony Walker, A/K/A Tony WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Leroy Buhl v. Mr. Cooksey, Warden Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Thomas Hill v. Cindi CurtinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.