State v. Hlavac
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s revocation of a stayed sentence on the grounds that the district court failed to make the proper findings on the record and that the evidence was insufficient to support the necessary findings for revocation. We reverse the revocation.
FACTS
The original charges against appellant Mary Jo Hlavac arose from her arrest for driving while intoxicated. Following Hla-vac’s plea of guilty to one of the DWI charges, the district court imposed a jail sentence and fine, but granted Hlavac a partial stay of execution. Among the conditions of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. TheelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. WittenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. BalmaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. BollinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003