Legal Opinion

State v. Hlavac

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1995No. C1-95-1548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s revocation of a stayed sentence on the grounds that the district court failed to make the proper findings on the record and that the evidence was insufficient to support the necessary findings for revocation. We reverse the revocation.

FACTS

The original charges against appellant Mary Jo Hlavac arose from her arrest for driving while intoxicated. Following Hla-vac’s plea of guilty to one of the DWI charges, the district court imposed a jail sentence and fine, but granted Hlavac a partial stay of execution. Among the conditions of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. TheelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. WittenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. BalmaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. BollinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API