Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Brooks

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The .superior court properly ruled that the Industrial Board erroneously found that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s application on the ground of change in condition, for the reason that it was not made “within two years after the date of final payment- of compensation.” The Code, § 114-709, as amended by the act of 1937 (Ga. L. 1937, p. 528), does not provide, as held by the Industrial Board, that an application 'for additional compensation based on the ground that there has been a change in the condition of the claimant since a previous…